Tag: performance

Posted on

World of Warcraft on a 13″ Retina Macbook Pro

I stopped playing WoW in 2008, and since I didn’t need Windows for gaming, I ended up putting Fedora (and ultimately Ubuntu) on my old Core 2 Duo desktop. After years of fighting with slow computers, I recently bit the bullet and bought the 13″ Retina Macbook Pro (MGX82LL/A). Even though I hadn’t played WoW in years – or any other PC games, for that matter – the gamer in me was still reluctant to go with a computer with no dedicated video card. I’d read up extensively on the Intel Iris 5100 chipset in the Macbook but I couldn’t find anything about its performance in WoW, which was the least-taxing game I could think of.

Well, as fate would have it, Blizzard recently announced they’d be purging the names of characters who hadn’t logged in for 5+ years. Since I had a new computer and I didn’t want to lose my beloved Undead Rogue it seemed like a good time to rejoin. After a couple days of playing, I figured I’d write this post as a service to any other would-be Macbook Pro purchasers curious about its performance in WoW.

This isn’t a detailed benchmarking post – I’m not Anandtech. The short version is that the performance of WoW on the MGX82LL/A is very good. I get 30-60 frames per second basically everywhere, though with settings only set to “fair.” The main thing I wanted to report here is heat. The laptop gets HOT when playing WoW. I installed iStat Menus to get the sensor data – see below.

WoW Settings
WoW Settings
MGX82LL/A CPU temperature - Baseline
MGX82LL/A CPU temperature – Baseline
MGX82LL/A temperature in WoW
MGX82LL/A temperature in WoW

The CPU sensors show temperature increases of over 100ºF. That’s pretty darn hot. I’ll play with the settings to see if I can get the temperature to something more reasonable.

Posted on

The m3.medium is terrible

I’ve been doing some testing of various instance types in our staging environment, originally just to see if Amazon’s t2.* line of instances is usable in a real-world scenario. In the end, I found that not only are the t2.mediums viable for what I want them to do, but they’re far better suited than the m3.medium, which I wouldn’t use for anything that you ever expect to reach any load.

Here are the conditions for my test:

  • Rails application (unicorn) fronted by nginx.
  • The number of unicorn processes is controlled by chef, currently set to (CPU count * 2), so a 2 CPU instance has 4 unicorn workers.
  • All instances are running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (AMI ami-864d84ee for HVM, ami-018c9568 for paravirtual) with kernel 3.13.0-29-generic #53-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 4 21:00:20 UTC 2014 x86_64.
  • The test used loader.io to simulate 65 concurrent clients hitting the API (adding products to cart) as fast as possible for 600 seconds (10 minutes).
  • The instances were all behind an Elastic Load Balancer, which routes traffic based on its own algorithm (supposedly the instances with the lowest CPU always gets the next request).

The below charts summarize the findings.

average nginx $request_time
average nginx $request_time

This chart shows each server’s performance as reported by nginx. The values are the average time to service each request and the standard deviation. While I expected the m3.large to outperform the m3.medium, I didn’t expect the difference to be so dramatic. The performance of the t2.medium is the real surprise, however.

#	_sourcehost	_avg	_stddev
1	m3.large	6.30324	3.84421
2	m3.medium	15.88136	9.29829
3	t2.medium	4.80078	2.71403

These charts show the CPU activity for each instance during the test (data as per CopperEgg).

m3.large
m3.large
t2.medium
t2.medium
m3.medium
m3.medium

The m3.medium has a huge amount of CPU steal, which I’m guessing accounts for its horrible performance. Anecdotally, in my own experience m3.medium far more prone to CPU steal than other instance types. Moving from m3.medium to c3.large (essentially the same instance with 2 cpus) eliminates the CPU steal issue. However, since the t2.medium performs as well as the c3.large or m3.large and costs half of the c3.large (or nearly 1/3 of the m3.large) I’m going to try running most of my backend fleet on t2.medium.

I haven’t mentioned the credits system the t2.* instances use for burstable performance, and that’s because my tests didn’t make much of a dent in the credit balance for these instances. The load test was 100x what I expect to see in normal traffic patterns, so the t2.medium with burstable performance seems like an ideal candidate. I might add a couple c3.large to the mix as a backstop in case the credits were depleted, but I don’t think that’s a major risk – especially not in our staging environment.

Edit: I didn’t include the numbers, but the performance seemed to be the consistent whether on hvm or paravirtual instances.

Posted on

Benchmarking disk IO on ext3 vs ext4 vs xfs with fio

With the old database phased out, I figured this was a good time to benchmark IO on it before either repurposing it or mothballing it. In the past I’ve used dd for elementary sequential read/write testing, but I recently found fio which is much more versatile. Apparently developed by FusionIO, fio lets you control concurrency, blocksize and many other parameters and reports lots more data, most notably IOPS.

I created 4 fio config files, basically the same as the one below, for direct / buffered disk access and sequential / random writes. All have 8k blocksize since that’s what Postgres uses by default.


[root@link ~]# cat random-write-test.fio
[random-write]
rw=randwrite
size=5G
direct=1
directory=/msa70/fio/data/
numjobs=5
group_reporting
name=random-write-direct
bs=8k
runtime=10

[root@link ~]# cat sequential-write-test-buf.fio
[sequential-write]
rw=write
size=5G
direct=0
directory=/msa70/fio/data/
numjobs=5
group_reporting
name=sequential-write-buffered
bs=8k
runtime=10

First I ran fio against a freshly created ext3 volume on our HP MSA70 with 24x 10kRPM SAS disks in RAID 10. The mkfs command used was mke2fs -j -m0 /dev/cciss/c0d0. The controller card is a HP P800. Here’s the output:

[wpspoiler name=’fio – ext3 full results’]

[root@link ~]# time fio random-write-test.fio random-write-test-buf.fio sequential-write-test.fio sequential-write-test-buf.fio
random-write-direct: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
random-write-direct: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
random-write-buf: (g=1): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
random-write-buf: (g=1): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
sequential-write-direct: (g=2): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
sequential-write-direct: (g=2): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
sequential-write-buffered: (g=3): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
sequential-write-buffered: (g=3): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
fio 1.57
Starting 20 processes
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [________________W___] [19.8% done] [0K/0K /s] [0 /0  iops] [eta 03m:14s]
random-write-direct: (groupid=0, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2447
  write: io=596856KB, bw=56946KB/s, iops=7118 , runt= 10481msec
    clat (usec): min=67 , max=944937 , avg=645.32, stdev=4647.69
     lat (usec): min=67 , max=944937 , avg=645.46, stdev=4647.69
    bw (KB/s) : min=  144, max=47152, per=22.71%, avg=12933.03, stdev=4985.93
  cpu          : usr=0.26%, sys=1.48%, ctx=74614, majf=0, minf=134
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/74607/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 100=12.22%, 250=80.24%, 500=6.59%, 750=0.20%, 1000=0.16%
     lat (msec): 2=0.07%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.10%, 20=0.05%, 50=0.08%
     lat (msec): 100=0.10%, 250=0.14%, 500=0.04%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
random-write-buf: (groupid=1, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2452
  write: io=6377.3MB, bw=472902KB/s, iops=59112 , runt= 13809msec
    clat (usec): min=8 , max=4490.8K, avg=77.54, stdev=3751.21
     lat (usec): min=8 , max=4490.8K, avg=77.66, stdev=3751.21
    bw (KB/s) : min=    7, max=438688, per=34.13%, avg=161414.56, stdev=63682.89
  cpu          : usr=2.27%, sys=24.01%, ctx=1596, majf=0, minf=134
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/816288/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 10=0.06%, 20=83.59%, 50=16.19%, 100=0.04%, 250=0.04%
     lat (usec): 500=0.03%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.03%, 50=0.01%
     lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.01%
sequential-write-direct: (groupid=2, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2457
  write: io=2832.0KB, bw=286105 B/s, iops=34 , runt= 10136msec
    clat (usec): min=75 , max=1506.6K, avg=157500.69, stdev=96237.55
     lat (usec): min=75 , max=1506.6K, avg=157500.81, stdev=96237.54
    bw (KB/s) : min=    6, max=  444, per=19.58%, avg=54.61, stdev=13.65
  cpu          : usr=0.00%, sys=0.00%, ctx=572, majf=0, minf=140
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/354/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 100=4.80%, 250=33.05%, 500=0.56%
     lat (msec): 50=1.13%, 100=18.36%, 250=25.99%, 500=9.04%, 750=4.24%
     lat (msec): 1000=1.41%, 2000=1.41%
sequential-write-buffered: (groupid=3, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2462
  write: io=255624KB, bw=19933KB/s, iops=2491 , runt= 12824msec
    clat (usec): min=7 , max=9411.7K, avg=1443.28, stdev=33091.95
     lat (usec): min=7 , max=9411.7K, avg=1443.38, stdev=33091.95
    bw (KB/s) : min=   31, max=43687, per=29.58%, avg=5896.30, stdev=2696.81
  cpu          : usr=0.05%, sys=0.89%, ctx=600, majf=0, minf=136
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/31953/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 10=13.51%, 20=77.52%, 50=8.68%, 100=0.07%, 250=0.08%
     lat (usec): 500=0.03%, 750=0.01%
     lat (msec): 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.02%, 50=0.01%, 250=0.01%
     lat (msec): 750=0.02%, 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.03%

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=596856KB, aggrb=56946KB/s, minb=58313KB/s, maxb=58313KB/s, mint=10481msec, maxt=10481msec

Run status group 1 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=6377.3MB, aggrb=472902KB/s, minb=484251KB/s, maxb=484251KB/s, mint=13809msec, maxt=13809msec

Run status group 2 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=2832KB, aggrb=279KB/s, minb=286KB/s, maxb=286KB/s, mint=10136msec, maxt=10136msec

Run status group 3 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=255624KB, aggrb=19933KB/s, minb=20411KB/s, maxb=20411KB/s, mint=12824msec, maxt=12824msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  cciss!c0d0: ios=798/24542244, merge=0/937067, ticks=15866/140262853, in_queue=140448875, util=89.71%

real    18m35.082s
user    0m4.328s
sys     5m16.479s
[root@link ~]#

[/wpspoiler]
That’s a lot of data; the most interesting numbers are these:

random-write-direct: (groupid=0, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2447
  write: io=596856KB, bw=56946KB/s, iops=7118 , runt= 10481msec
random-write-buf: (groupid=1, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2452
  write: io=6377.3MB, bw=472902KB/s, iops=59112 , runt= 13809msec
sequential-write-direct: (groupid=2, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2457
  write: io=2832.0KB, bw=286105 B/s, iops=34 , runt= 10136msec
sequential-write-buffered: (groupid=3, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2462
  write: io=255624KB, bw=19933KB/s, iops=2491 , runt= 12824msec

I then reformatted the RAIDed LUN with ext4 with mkfs.ext4 -m0 /dev/cciss/c0d0 and ran the same tests again:
[wpspoiler name=’fio – ext4 full results’]

[root@link ~]# time fio random-write-test.fio random-write-test-buf.fio sequential-write-test.fio sequential-write-test-buf.fio
random-write-direct: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
random-write-direct: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
random-write-buf: (g=1): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
random-write-buf: (g=1): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
sequential-write-direct: (g=2): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
sequential-write-direct: (g=2): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
sequential-write-buffered: (g=3): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
sequential-write-buffered: (g=3): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
fio 1.57
Starting 20 processes
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
Jobs: 5 (f=5): [_______________WWWWW] [21.5% done] [0K/126.1M /s] [0 /15.9K iops] [eta 02m:30s]
random-write-direct: (groupid=0, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2379
  write: io=589392KB, bw=58933KB/s, iops=7366 , runt= 10001msec
    clat (usec): min=77 , max=2522.4K, avg=781.82, stdev=9768.99
     lat (usec): min=77 , max=2522.4K, avg=781.95, stdev=9768.99
    bw (KB/s) : min=  515, max=44176, per=22.05%, avg=12996.62, stdev=5332.75
  cpu          : usr=0.26%, sys=2.86%, ctx=73715, majf=0, minf=134
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/73674/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 100=2.54%, 250=92.13%, 500=4.76%, 750=0.14%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.07%, 20=0.04%, 50=0.07%
     lat (msec): 100=0.09%, 250=0.11%, 500=0.03%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.01%
random-write-buf: (groupid=1, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2384
  write: io=6707.1MB, bw=670727KB/s, iops=83840 , runt= 10241msec
    clat (usec): min=7 , max=1582.5K, avg=57.04, stdev=1910.33
     lat (usec): min=7 , max=1582.5K, avg=57.15, stdev=1910.33
    bw (KB/s) : min=   30, max=518784, per=25.08%, avg=168240.26, stdev=84472.16
  cpu          : usr=2.51%, sys=25.56%, ctx=35766, majf=0, minf=134
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/858614/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 10=2.14%, 20=91.72%, 50=5.11%, 100=0.31%, 250=0.15%
     lat (usec): 500=0.19%, 750=0.15%, 1000=0.09%
     lat (msec): 2=0.08%, 4=0.03%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
     lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2000=0.01%
sequential-write-direct: (groupid=2, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2389
  write: io=839760KB, bw=83959KB/s, iops=10494 , runt= 10002msec
    clat (usec): min=70 , max=300244 , avg=473.09, stdev=3815.84
     lat (usec): min=71 , max=300244 , avg=473.22, stdev=3815.84
    bw (KB/s) : min= 8198, max=30528, per=20.27%, avg=17014.88, stdev=1677.78
  cpu          : usr=0.32%, sys=3.15%, ctx=104986, majf=0, minf=140
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/104970/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 100=73.60%, 250=26.18%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%
     lat (msec): 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.18%, 500=0.02%
sequential-write-buffered: (groupid=3, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2394
  write: io=1730.7MB, bw=163683KB/s, iops=20460 , runt= 10827msec
    clat (usec): min=7 , max=7649.9K, avg=220.41, stdev=12535.19
     lat (usec): min=7 , max=7649.9K, avg=220.52, stdev=12535.19
    bw (KB/s) : min=   27, max=331055, per=35.92%, avg=58788.88, stdev=27863.44
  cpu          : usr=0.42%, sys=5.54%, ctx=4119, majf=0, minf=136
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/221525/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 10=50.94%, 20=47.34%, 50=1.45%, 100=0.18%, 250=0.05%
     lat (usec): 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
     lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
     lat (msec): 2000=0.01%, >=2000=0.01%

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=589392KB, aggrb=58933KB/s, minb=60347KB/s, maxb=60347KB/s, mint=10001msec, maxt=10001msec

Run status group 1 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=6707.1MB, aggrb=670726KB/s, minb=686824KB/s, maxb=686824KB/s, mint=10241msec, maxt=10241msec

Run status group 2 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=839760KB, aggrb=83959KB/s, minb=85974KB/s, maxb=85974KB/s, mint=10002msec, maxt=10002msec

Run status group 3 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=1730.7MB, aggrb=163683KB/s, minb=167611KB/s, maxb=167611KB/s, mint=10827msec, maxt=10827msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  cciss!c0d0: ios=52/276341, merge=0/553601, ticks=224/1731709, in_queue=1735311, util=94.47%

real    0m42.218s
user    0m1.812s
sys     0m19.028s
[root@link ~]#

[/wpspoiler]
Summary numbers:

random-write-direct: (groupid=0, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2379
  write: io=589392KB, bw=58933KB/s, iops=7366 , runt= 10001msec
random-write-buf: (groupid=1, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2384
  write: io=6707.1MB, bw=670727KB/s, iops=83840 , runt= 10241msec
sequential-write-direct: (groupid=2, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2389
  write: io=839760KB, bw=83959KB/s, iops=10494 , runt= 10002msec
sequential-write-buffered: (groupid=3, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2394
  write: io=1730.7MB, bw=163683KB/s, iops=20460 , runt= 10827msec

This is just one run of each test, so not very scientific, but it does look pretty clear that ext4 outperforms ext3 (I actually did run the test several times but didn’t collect the results, they were pretty consistent though). What the test doesn’t show, but you can see from the time output is that each ext3 test took over 4 minutes to run while the ext4 tests each took about 10-12 seconds. In the ext3 tests, each “file1: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)” line took nearly a minute; in the ext4 tests they were essentially instant.

This is nothing groundbreaking, I was just playing around with fio and figured I’d post the results in case anyone else was curious. I did notice some oddities though, like the fact that random buffered writes appear to be faster than even sequential buffered writes, on both ext3 and ext4 – on ext4, showing 670 MB/s random buffered writes and 83k IOPS. That doesn’t seem to make much sense, but I’ll leave the tea-leaf reading to someone else.

Addendum: I ran the test with XFS, just for fun. Overall, it was significantly faster than ext3, but not as fast as ext4, though sequential buffered writes were much faster than either ext3 or ext4.

[wpspoiler name=’fio – xfs full results’]

[root@link ~]# mkfs.xfs -f -b size=4k /dev/cciss/c0d0
meta-data=/dev/cciss/c0d0        isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=107506378 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=430025510, imaxpct=5
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=209973, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
[root@link ~]# mount -v -t xfs /dev/cciss/c0d0 /msa70/
/dev/cciss/c0d0 on /msa70 type xfs (rw)
[root@link ~]# mkdir -p /msa70/fio/data
(reverse-i-search)`f': mkdir -p /msa70/^Co/data
[root@link ~]# time fio random-write-test.fio random-write-test-buf.fio sequential-write-test.fio sequential-write-test-buf.fio
random-write-direct: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
random-write-direct: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
random-write-buf: (g=1): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
random-write-buf: (g=1): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
sequential-write-direct: (g=2): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
sequential-write-direct: (g=2): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
sequential-write-buffered: (g=3): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
...
sequential-write-buffered: (g=3): rw=write, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=1
fio 1.57
Starting 20 processes
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
random-write-buf: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-direct: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
sequential-write-buffered: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 5120MB)
Jobs: 5 (f=5): [_______________WWWWW] [91.3% done] [0K/143.4M /s] [0 /17.1K iops] [eta 00m:26s]
random-write-direct: (groupid=0, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2662
  write: io=416920KB, bw=41688KB/s, iops=5210 , runt= 10001msec
    clat (usec): min=83 , max=1592.6K, avg=1013.62, stdev=10137.19
     lat (usec): min=83 , max=1592.6K, avg=1013.77, stdev=10137.19
    bw (KB/s) : min=    7, max=23184, per=22.46%, avg=9363.32, stdev=2852.49
  cpu          : usr=0.31%, sys=1.61%, ctx=106802, majf=0, minf=134
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/52115/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 100=0.06%, 250=4.55%, 500=87.85%, 750=4.23%, 1000=0.70%
     lat (msec): 2=2.01%, 4=0.13%, 10=0.24%, 20=0.07%, 50=0.01%
     lat (msec): 100=0.03%, 250=0.06%, 500=0.03%, 750=0.02%, 2000=0.02%
random-write-buf: (groupid=1, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2667
  write: io=6557.9MB, bw=27876KB/s, iops=3484 , runt=240892msec
    clat (usec): min=7 , max=237984K, avg=1631.10, stdev=257906.92
     lat (usec): min=7 , max=237984K, avg=1631.22, stdev=257906.92
    bw (KB/s) : min=    0, max=628832, per=1222.74%, avg=340851.04, stdev=70996.06
  cpu          : usr=0.13%, sys=1.33%, ctx=24945, majf=0, minf=134
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/839397/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 10=18.02%, 20=79.39%, 50=2.19%, 100=0.18%, 250=0.07%
     lat (usec): 500=0.03%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.04%
     lat (msec): 2=0.02%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.02%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
     lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 2000=0.01%
     lat (msec): >=2000=0.01%
sequential-write-direct: (groupid=2, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2677
  write: io=519056KB, bw=51895KB/s, iops=6486 , runt= 10002msec
    clat (usec): min=81 , max=242925 , avg=825.67, stdev=3980.13
     lat (usec): min=81 , max=242925 , avg=825.81, stdev=3980.13
    bw (KB/s) : min=   59, max=20029, per=19.03%, avg=9873.41, stdev=2128.50
  cpu          : usr=0.23%, sys=1.43%, ctx=129921, majf=0, minf=140
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/64882/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 100=60.60%, 250=38.63%, 500=0.01%
     lat (msec): 10=0.10%, 50=0.11%, 100=0.23%, 250=0.32%
sequential-write-buffered: (groupid=3, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2682
  write: io=7688.1MB, bw=770776KB/s, iops=96347 , runt= 10215msec
    clat (usec): min=6 , max=1727.2K, avg=53.67, stdev=1633.96
     lat (usec): min=6 , max=1727.2K, avg=53.78, stdev=1633.96
    bw (KB/s) : min= 5340, max=704608, per=21.28%, avg=164049.10, stdev=87065.00
  cpu          : usr=2.15%, sys=19.54%, ctx=16284, majf=0, minf=136
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued r/w/d: total=0/984185/0, short=0/0/0
     lat (usec): 10=41.97%, 20=56.42%, 50=1.10%, 100=0.23%, 250=0.10%
     lat (usec): 500=0.05%, 750=0.02%, 1000=0.03%
     lat (msec): 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.02%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
     lat (msec): 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 2000=0.01%

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=416920KB, aggrb=41687KB/s, minb=42688KB/s, maxb=42688KB/s, mint=10001msec, maxt=10001msec

Run status group 1 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=6557.9MB, aggrb=27876KB/s, minb=28545KB/s, maxb=28545KB/s, mint=240892msec, maxt=240892msec

Run status group 2 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=519056KB, aggrb=51895KB/s, minb=53140KB/s, maxb=53140KB/s, mint=10002msec, maxt=10002msec

Run status group 3 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=7688.1MB, aggrb=770776KB/s, minb=789274KB/s, maxb=789274KB/s, mint=10215msec, maxt=10215msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  cciss!c0d0: ios=8/836060, merge=0/549215, ticks=11/36458428, in_queue=36468678, util=98.88%

real    4m31.948s
user    0m2.692s
sys     0m24.351s
[root@link ~]#

[/wpspoiler]

XFS abridged:

random-write-direct: (groupid=0, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2662
  write: io=416920KB, bw=41688KB/s, iops=5210 , runt= 10001msec
random-write-buf: (groupid=1, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2667
  write: io=6557.9MB, bw=27876KB/s, iops=3484 , runt=240892msec
sequential-write-direct: (groupid=2, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2677
  write: io=519056KB, bw=51895KB/s, iops=6486 , runt= 10002msec
sequential-write-buffered: (groupid=3, jobs=5): err= 0: pid=2682
  write: io=7688.1MB, bw=770776KB/s, iops=96347 , runt= 10215msec